Letter: Ironic contradictions in gun-abortion debate
Published 1:12 pm Sunday, April 9, 2023
Americans are always concerned about their personal freedom. The great outcry today is: “Don’t take away our assault rifles. Thomas Jefferson wanted us to be able to conduct mass shootings on our own citizens.” No matter how many people die, we can never abridge the right of each citizen to kill other citizens if they think it is appropriate. Now that is personal freedom.
Trending
On the other hand, it is now very popular to not only restrict a woman’s personal freedom to decide if she wants to give birth to a child, but to criminalize her or anyone who attempts to abort a pregnancy. States are even prohibiting a drug that can prevent a pregnancy. Women are denied the right to choose if they can adequately care for another child. For some reason this personal freedom is different from the “right to bear arms.”
Let’s see. It is mostly a lot of white males (and some females) who must have their weapons — to protect themselves from government tyranny. And it is mostly a lot of poor, often minority women who should be forced to have children whether they want them or not. The government tyranny against these women is somehow acceptable.
Don’t forget either, we are a nation that champions “family values.” These champions are zealously concerned about a child’s right to life — until the moment of conception. After that, we really don’t care what happens at all. We don’t champion better health care, or better educational opportunities, or affordable child care for these children we care so much about. Our “family values” would rather perpetuate a life that is delegated to poverty, drug abuse, and incarceration. Of course, these discards of our society have only themselves to blame for being born and not using their personal freedom to improve themselves.
Trending
MICHAEL GOLDBERG
Ocean Park